Droid defines the Decades best movies – #14 The Royal Tenenbaums (2001)
I’ve been stuck trying to write this review, as it’s difficult to put in to words why I like it without pulling out nothing but clichés. I’ll try to get a few out of the way and hopefully something readable will occur. Bear with me.
The plot, as it is, is simple. There isn’t really one. Royal Tenenbaum (Gene Hackman) is the estranged father of a trio of talented kids, each of whom have since grown up and had meltdowns. Chas (Ben Stiller) is a natural businessman who, since the death of his wife in a plane crash, spends his days being overprotective of his two boys. Richie (Luke Wilson) is the tennis star who had an unexplained meltdown in the final of a tournament and Margot (Gwyneth Paltrow) is the adopted daughter who became a successful playwright as a child. Etheline (Angelica Houston) is their mother, an archaeologist who pushed their potential. Eli (Owen Wilson) is the kid across the street who dreamed of being a Tenenbaum and has become a successful novelist. All these characters (and many more) come together and quirkiness ensues.
Much like Wes Anderson’s previous film ‘Rushmore’, this film works as well as it does because of the lead actor. It was Jason Schwartzman as Max Fischer in ‘Rushmore’, and in ‘Tenenbaums’ it’s Gene Hackman. He makes what could’ve been just a shifty, selfish bastard into a hilarious shifty, selfish bastard. It’s a brilliant performance and completely unique. He has a certain cadence that naturally fits with the writing. Despite being a jerk to pretty much everyone, he’s never irritating and always amusing. Hopefully Hackman will appear in another Anderson film soon.
I’ve seen this film labelled a ‘dramedy’. I hate that term. And I don’t really think it fits anyway. I don’t particularly think it ever strays from being a comedy. Sure there are serious moments (in the context of the film), but it achieves more of a state of melancholy. So, hence forth, I’m labelling it a ‘melancomedy’.
Credit where credit is due. The writing in this film is phenomenal. Anderson and Owen Wilson have filled it with oddball characters, but made them believable. And each character has individual moments to shine. I particularly liked the story of how Pagoda (Kumar Pallana) and Royal met, and Dusty (Seymour Cassel) dishing out medical advice. The dialogue is hilarious, a lot of it due to Royal saying inappropriate or unsympathetic things like “I’m very sorry for your loss. Your mother was a terribly attractive woman.” or “Anybody interested in grabbing a couple of burgers and hittin’ the cemetery?” It’s noticeable that Anderson’s less successful later films weren’t co-written by Wilson.
The look of the film is one that has since become the Anderson trademark. It’s a throwback to the 70’s fashion, with a little 60’s and 80’s blended in there as well. It’s a distinctive look, and that’s difficult to achieve in todays films. He definitely see’s himself as a 70’s filmmaker. You always know you’re watching a Wes Anderson film. Just see his “The Fantastic Mr Fox” and you’ll understand what I mean. His animated stop motion film looks, sounds and feels like a companion piece to this.
The film is narrated by Alec Baldwin and is edited as if it’s being read as an audio book. It’s one of the many stylistic choices that could have threatened the whole thing, but it pays off. Like Quentin Tarantino, Anderson’s films are notable for their music, and ‘Tenenbaums’ is filled with 70’s music from The Rolling Stones, Van Morrison and The Beatles.
I’ve seen ‘The Royal Tenenbaums’ numerous times and this melancomedy (not dramedy!) never fails to make me laugh. But it’s more serious moments find a way of endearing the film and making it even more memorable. And then there’s the dialogue…
As an example of the quality of the writing, here’s an exchange between Royal and Henry Sherman (Danny Glover).
Royal: I’ve always been considered an asshole for about as long as I can remember. That’s just my style. But I’d really feel blue if I didn’t think you were going to forgive me.
Henry: I don’t think you’re an asshole, Royal. I just think you’re kind of a son of a bitch.
Royal: Well, I really appreciate that.
#17 – Where The Wild Things Are (2009)
#18 – Kingdom of Heaven (2005) Directors Cut
Thank christ this review is over. It’s a bit shite, and doesn’t really do the flick justice but I really needed to get it out of the way so I can continue with the list!
This movie really took a dive for me on subsequent viewing and the amount of nerdgasms by film dorks REALLY put me off it. Hackman was great though.
Never saw it. Do Luke and Owen NOT play siblings in this?
I may or might not have seen this, honestly can’t remember, but after reading your take on it I may have to seek it out. Hackman usually a plus, how was Cassel?
The biggest drawback that I see is Lule Wilson, can’t watch TV for 5 minutes without his shilling for (that which must not be named) phone company!
Still need to see ‘Fantastic Mr. Fox.
Nice job Droid.
Oh man, those commercials are fucking terrible. But this movie isn’t. This movie is really very good.
And Luke doesn’t look as though he were recently attacked by bees, like he does in the (irritatingly persistent, godawful) commercials. So sick of ’em, and I don’t even watch that much TV….they really are just always on.
Is that the internet connection one? I was watching some NFL via the interwebs the other day and that ad kept popping up. In fact, every fucking commercial break played the exact same ads. Très annoying.
Wilson does ads for a cellular carrier called AT&T. They are on constantly now because another carrier called Verizon scored a massive PR coup on them about coverages areas and AT&T is scrambling to fix the damage. At least that’s what the Wall Street journal told a while back.
Okay. I kept seeing one where he was boasting about one companies (presumably AT&T) internet speed over another (presumably Verizon).
Yep that’s the one.
This is sad. I didn’t recognize him! Knew I knew the face, but…..
It’s a fair choice- and I was expexting someone to do an Anderson or 3, but I agree with Xi.
I think, really, that I’m not big on quirkiness. I remember liking this without feeling any real need to go back to it.
No Frank you aren’t a film dork because you aren’t a pretencious asshat more concerned with looking like you know everything about movies then actually liking movies, or as it’s known in the common parlance, an “Asimovlives”
AKA Mammaries of Mommy AKA BladerunneEunuch AKA Charlie GoatHumper.
I always cringed whenever I saw Harold or one of his other cronies referring to Everyone who posts there as a ‘filmgeek’. Really Harold-?! Try the celery.
He’s retired? Damn.
Jesus. He’s 79! Well, I suppose that’s an acceptable retirement age.
Shows you how much I pay attention. He retired in 2004. His last flick was ‘Welcome to Mooseport’!? Fucking hell.
The reason Hackman is so god damned cool is because he enlisted in the Marine Corps when he was 16.
I really like this movie. But I kind of hate rushmore. I think its just because I want to punch the main guy in the mouth the whole fucking time. I think the only time I’ve liked Shawrtzman was in Spun.
Overall I’m liking your list with the exception of The Hurt Locker, just because the movie didn’t hold up at all on second viewing.
Though I haven’t seen IB. Anyone else think that QT saw this and the use of Alec as the narrorator and stole the idea for Samuel doing it in IB?
It’s not really the same thing in IB. The SLJ bit is only one scene. Like a newsreel (if memory serves). And the chapter cards in IB aren’t really there for any particular reason.
ok. Need to see that fucking movie so I can do my best of 09 finally…..hint hint D9 is number one.
Well actually I’ve owned D9 for like three weeks. I sort of afraid to watch it again, in fear that I won’t like it as much.
Hint Hint… No shit.
i mean unless Funny People or IB are really THAT GOOD!! I mean no was Funny People is, but IB has a shot.
Did you see it more than once at the cinema?
Its the true test. I’ve only seen it once.
I’m trying to decide if I should count some films that I saw for the first time in 2009 but really came out in 2007, like Wild Things, PA, Trick Or Treat, Mirageman.
I read somewhere that 2009 was a great year for movies that came out in 2007. Some horror movie a day blog thats real popular.
Wow. District 9?
Shock revelation. We’d never have seen that coming.
Naw. Didn’t see anything twice in the cinema this year. trying to convince my wife to see Avatar again. I may end up just going on my own.
IB isn’t. Funny People isn’t.
How bad is funny People. It actually looks like it tries to rip off a lot from this movie. In terms of Sandlers character compared to Hackmans.
It’s not terrible. It’s okay. Just kinda boring and way too long. Not very funny. It’s NOTHING like Tenenbaums.
Cause in the trailers they present it as this guy (whos about to die) trying to go back and make amends and is a complete jerk. It takes place in his house. I bet Apatow thinks he’s as good as Anderson.
Difference is Sandler actually IS dying. And he’s more of sad, lonely bloke than a hilarious shifty, selfish bastard.
I don’t think Apatow would consider himself anything like Anderson. I think he’s modelled himself after James L. Brooks.
Freaks and Geeks feels Andersonish.
Maybe. I’d more say it felt John Hughes-ish.
John Hughes by way of Linklater.
Is how I’d describe F&G.
Fine Apatow probably hasn’t even heard of Anderson then.
You don’t like people disagreeing with you, do you Koutch?
I’d go with that.
Its not so much disagreeing with me, I’m fine with it. I agree with your thoughts. I think its more you don’t agree with me.
Seriously, Apatow is a talentless unfunny cunt who’s surrounded himself with other talentless unfunny cunts to make unfunny, cuntish films that annoy me.
I may not be all for quirkiness a la Anderson, but I’ve never so much as smiled at an Apatow film, and have been seriously annoyed by a lot of them.
Freeks and Geeks is the best thing he’s done. 40 Year Old Virgin was good, everything else is crap.
I’m not quite sure that I follow.
F&G was good. Undeclared was alright. 40YOV was good. Knocked Up had a few good moments.
He doesn’t annoy me as much as you.
I mean I said Apatow is kind of like Anderson. And instead of going, sure you persisted in naming other guys he’s more like. Which yes is true. But you wanna say that Apatow doesn’t owe anything to Anderson so you need to attack that thought.
Plus I’m just not really in a argumentive mood today. So sure I’ll just agree with you that Apatow doesn’t owe anything to Anderson.
Ugh I tried to watch Undecleared and maybe it was the half hour aspect of the show that held it back. It was just annoying to me. Plus I think I picked it up RIGHT after burning through Freeks and Geeks so it was odd to see these guys all in the 80s then all of the sudden they were in the 2000s.
And what pissed me off about Knocked Up was probably critics. They went ON AND ON about how funny it was and how quotable it is. Also that it was better then 40 Year Virgin. Sooo I went in with these high expectations, then I came out going???? I paid money to see that? It looks like a made for TV film, and the story feels like a lifetime movie and the jokes were few and far between. If at all, I don’t think I laughed at anything in that movie….wait yeah the dinner scene were the guys were going on and on and the women had no idea what they were talking about.
Well for starters I’m not “attacking” anyone. I’m merely stating my opinion. I never said you were wrong. You’ve assumed that.
I wouldn’t have the first clue if Apatow “owes” anything to Anderson. But from what I’ve read of him, Apatows been around for a long time and in my opinion, he’s more like Brooks and Hughes than Anderson.
But each to their own.
Yeah he is more like them. But the use of the same group of people is more like Anderson then those two. Those two just use the same one or two people. All of Andersons movies and Apatows movies have pretty much the exact same cast.
And yeah fuck Apatow has probably been around longer then Anderson, but his movies came out after Andersons.
In terms of using a core group of actors as their mainstays, then yeah, they are similar.
Ok how about this then. I caught like 20 minutes of Thank you for smoking last night, and was surprised that Reitman actually had a style in that movie, and the scenes I saw felt very Anderson like…but cut to Up in the Air a movie with no style, feels like he was aiming for Apatow’s lack of style (saying that the screenplay works on its own).
Don’t mistake lack of style with “being a talentless unfunny cunt” because Apatow is the latter rather than the former.
I quite like Thank you for smoking.
I fucking loathed Superbad.
I’d have to watch Thankyou for smoking again(which is very doubtful), but I’ve almost forgotten Up In The Air. It’s all very innocuous filmmaking that won’t upset anyone. At least Anderson has a style you can either like or dislike.
Well thats what I am saying. Smoking = Anderson. Up In the Air = Apatow.
I don’t mind smoking its not nearly as bad as Up In the Air. Its just not funny for the most part, but after seeing some scenes last night I may have been too harsh. But the inclusion of the worst sex scene ever needs to be noted when talking about that movie.
Yeah it is innocuous film making thats why I can’t stand that anyone would ever put Up in the Air as the best film of the year.
Just because it shows that it didn’t even try. Why celebrate a movie that didn’t try to do anything? Sure like the script or some of the acting, but to say it was the best movie of the year, when it could’ve been made by anyone?
Worst sex scene in history= Watchmen.
Do not debate me on this.
Second worst= Showgirls. Although I do think Elizabeth Berkely thrashing around like a tasered dolphin is hilarious.
Showgirls sex scene is AWESOME! It’s like she’s auditioning for Under Deep Blue Seige!
Yeah Showgirls Sex Scene was awesome. Thank You For Smoking is the worst.
Its like they wanted this hard corse R scene, but since Katie wouldn’t do it…they still went with it anyway. And they are moving around the office and aren’t they still almost fully clothed? It was just fucking stupid.
Sex scene in shoot em up is pretty fucking stupid as well.
Yeah shit that MAY be worse, just because everyone is always. HOW CAN YOU NOT LIKE SHOOT’EM UPs SEX SCENE SHOOT OUT????
Ummm easily because its lame. First off you Monica top off in everything, yet it what could be a funny as shit VERY R graphic scene, you got some lame scene that just doesn’t work.
Everything Shoot’em Up thinks it is, Crank 2 actually is.
Worst sex scene contenders are Body of Evidence (is that what its called? The Madonna one?) and that hilariously ridiculous Bruce Willis gets his knob out movie with Jane March.
Colour of Night. I have that movie, need to watch it.
Haven’t seen Freaks and Geeks.
Am unlikely to see Freaks and Geeks. Did not like 40 year old virgin at all, hated Superbad and Knocked up almost as much as HOD hates Blindness.
Turdmen Sex scene is–regrettable, shall we say?
Thank you for Smoking is a good movie. I enjoyed.
Not into Apatow’s stuff. Haven’t watched much of’em. Caught some of 4o and whatever, but his stuff strikes me as badly warmed over ’80’s raunch comedies w/ just more body function stuff tossed in. Plus you really gotta like Steve Carrell (nails on chalkboard here) or that fat curly haired fucker who was in Superbad and etc. Pass.
I say go w/ In Bruges instead, you’ll be much better off-
Well, In Bruges is another kettle of fish. It’s nothing short of brilliant.
I should do a best of 2009 at some stage. hint hint… The Hurt Locker.
hint hint… or is it!?!?!?
MWA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!
I didn’t mind TYFS, but I just don’t think I’ll ever watch it again.
UITA isn’t a bad film. It’s just bland as fuck and not nearly as poignant or “timely” as it thinks it is. It doesn’t offer any insight in to the realities of the economic crisis.
I actually think that the economic crisis has detracted from the movie. Without that as a backdrop, it would just be the story of a guy that is a lonely nomad and is good at a horrible job.
Yeah the whole economic crisis was really just one sentence in the film.
Never once do you feel that Cloons was worried about losing a job. Plus he fires people for a living…thats what he did. SO no matter when you film him he’s ALWAYS going to be firing people. Maybe if the movie was from the viewpoint of the ivy league top of the class girl who saw that the firing buisness was booming and she wanted some of that money, it would be “timely”. But that guy going around firing people really was just another day at the job for him. Its like he probably wouldn’t even notice that more people are losing jobs.
Actually I think the fact that the book was written pre 9/11, and since then SOOO much has changed in flying, and non of that is addressed that it actually makes the movie dated.
What wasn’t addressed about air travel? They have that whole sequence in the airport of going through all the security procedures, taking off belts and shoes, they allude to “random” screenings, a couple of shots of how long the lines are, etc. That’s really all that’s changed, at least on domestic flights (I wouldn’t know about international)…
I had a traveling job out of D.C. when 9/11 happened, and we were all surprised by how little air travel changed….Sure, waits were slightly longer and the presence of armed teenage MP’s could be somewhat unnerving, but most of the talk about how Totally Different it was just came across as hype. At least, until the ‘shoe bomber’, and subsequent shoe-removal requirement. Annoying but not unbearable. The main change, from our perspective, was that our boss required us to get to the airport much earlier, and for no good reason, so we’d be stuck just sitting around drinking BK coffee or passing back and forth through security to smoke. For hours.
Lastly on this, I also found it shit that she walked straight in to another job at the end. You make a movie about how times are tough and everyones getting laid off and jobs are scarce, then you go show a main character QUIT then walk in to another job. It’s completely fucked.
Hahahahah yeah, thats a good point.
But then again….she was a Ivy Leauge College Top Of Her Class graduate!
Actually, that doesn’t bother me that much. I know of 3 people that have moved jobs recently. Mrs. Jarv moved to a better job in a different company, and they’re hacking staff all over the place in her sector.
It does happen
That may be true, but it doesn’t work me in this movie.
Have you seen it, Jarv?
The only real shot that the movie had at being timely is that if George got fired at the end and couldn’t get a new job.
But Jarv, I don’t think your wife is a fresh out of college person who quit her first job after only a couple of week/months?
That is true. Mrs. Jarv had been in that shitty underpaying role for nearly 3 years.
I haven’t seen it, but one of the papers leaked that she got rehired by accident.
And it makes it out that it’s because of a recommendation letter from Clooney. AND I believe (i’d have to confirm this) that it’s the ‘dream’ job (or an equivelant) she gave up when she moved to be with her boyfriend.
Rehired by accident? No. That doesn’t happen.
In fact, how the fuck do you get rehired by accident?
It would be handy for me to know!
Either way her character was fucking awful. Obviously Reitman has no idea what those type of girls are.
Yeah sounds like Milton Waddams thing.
Speaking of which…. what the fuck?
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1319929856/nm0740535
Hahahahaha!
A misplaced comma/ sloppy syntax and all chaos is unleashed:
“I haven’t seen it, but one of the papers, by accident, released that the character got rehired.”
Happy now?
Twat.
That’s not very nice.
Rude cunt.
I mean, I go out of my way to help you, and all you do is call me names.
Ungrateful cunt.
Jam your help up your ass, ya dippy prick. Get it right the first time or fuck right off.
Braindead bag of cocks.
Well, there’s clearly no helping you unreconstructed convicts.
Yikes!
What the fuck happened?
I haven’t seem that one yet. I’ve really liked most of Wes Anderson’s movies (wasn’t that big on the train one, though). And I love stop-motion. I don’t know. Been a bit nervous about seeing it for some reason…
There is that Other Owen Wilson/Hackman flick-Behind Enemy Lines AKA ‘Weather Continuity Errors as far’s the eyes can see’. It’s the A-Team all over.