superHUMAN! The Real LIfe Super-Hero Movies: Hero at Large (1980).


Welcome to a new series! We’ve been completely shit so far in 2015 (well, Droid has been keeping up his usual fine run), and have let the content level drop a fair amount. So, thankfully, ContinentalOp has stepped into the breach and come up with a new series- a look at the “real life” Superhero movies. There are loads of these, and the quality of them varies from the decent to the frankly risible. Anyhoo, here’s ContinentalOp with what is arguably the progenitor of the whole subgenre.

Massive credit is due here, as I think this may be the most erudite review that any of us has ever produced- it even has footnotes backing assertions, unlike the wild unqualified shite that I usually turn out. Anyhoo, Take it away, dude:

Hero at Large

Introductory Overview

It has been awhile since I have reviewed anything here, so I thought instead of just writing one review I should do a series to kind of force myself to get off my ass. So here it is, the first installment in a series of critical analysis concerning a very specific trend in modern superhero movies, what I call the Real Life Super-Hero movie. In this installment I cover the first movie to show a regular guy to don a superhero costume and fight crime: 1980’s Hero at Large.

A Brief Overview: What the Hell is a Real Life Super-Hero Movie

Unless you’ve been stuck in the Phantom Zone (nerd humor at its finest here), you’ve no doubt noticed that superhero movies have been the biggest genre in the 21st century. Each year famous Marvel and DC characters such as Superman, Batman, Spider-Man, and the Avengers have all landed in the top 10 of the box office, often in the number one spot. Superhero films have gotten so big they have even spawned sub-genres outside of the traditional superhero story: we have seen films that could be listed as animated superhero movies (The Incredibles, Megamind, Big Hero 6), kids/family films (Shark Boy and Lava Girl, Sky High, Zoom), comedies/parodies (Mystery Men, Superhero Movie, My Super Ex-Girlfriend, The Specials), found footage (Chronicle), deconstruction (Unbreakable, Watchmen), and even Westerns and period films (Jonah Hex, Lone Ranger, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen). One of these sub-genres is the so-called “real life” superhero film.

In truth the Real Life Super-Hero (RLSH) isn’t really a sub-genre as much a trend that occurred for the most part from 2009 to 2012. The films that qualify is pretty much limited to Defendor, Super, Boy Wonder, and the two Kick Ass movies. All of these films , more or less, followed the same concept of taking place in the “real” world, one where no one has powers (and no aliens or magic or futuristic technology) and there are no superheroes until the protagonist of the story decides to don a costume and fight crime, often directly inspired by the comic books he or she reads. Most of these films try to treat the subject matter “realistically”, often presenting the concept of costume crime fighting as insane and ludicrous (as if we need a movie to tell us this).

The development of these films also seem to coincide with not only the growth in popularity of superhero films but also the actual rise of the Real-Life Superhero movement, a phenomenon where people inspired by the funny books dress up in costumes and/or mask and fight crime – or more accurately just patrol and perform community service (I have a hard time imagining Batman and the Punisher working in a soup kitchen).

Hero at Large 2

Ben Fodor, aka Phoenix Jones, costumed vigilante, pro-MMA fighter, and proponent of mutual combat.

Major inspirations from comics and cinema upon the trend include the 1984 comic book The Watchmen (with it’s “realistic” depiction of costumed crime-fighters), Christopher Nolan’s naturalistic and gritty depiction of Batman in Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, and (surprising) Martin Scorsese’s and Paul Schrader’s masterpiece Taxi Driver.

This trend of RLSH movies is in my opinion the most interesting thing to come out of the comic book superhero explosion, and not because I think they are the best artistically or the most popular – far from it. Most of them are, at best, mediocre (with a couple that are God-awful and only one that I would actually call very good), and with only about a half-dozen having been made so far (most of them on low budgets and having a poor showing at the box office) they hardly qualifying as being in high demand amongst filmgoers and comic book fans. No, what I find interesting about them is that they are the most self-reflective of the superhero movies, showing what we, the audience, think of funny book heroes and what purpose they serve in pop culture. RLSH movies also often hold up a mirror to the CMYK colored subconscious of comic geeks, reflecting back how they view themselves and their relationship with the genre.

My first film, Hero at Large, however, isn’t really part of this trend but the predecessor to the others in this series. It predates almost all of the influences (excluding Taxi Driver) and could be viewed as the grandfather of the sub-genre (if we were going to label it a sub-genre). Hero at Largecame out two decades before Bryan Singer’s X-Men launched the modern superhero craze; it also predates the comic book the Watchmen by some six years and Batmen Begins by 26 years  (and many of the nerds who would join the RLSH Movement probably hadn’t even been born yet). In fact, the only superhero films at this time were Superman: the Motion Picture (1978) and its sequel Superman II (1980).

Well, those two and – according to Hero at Large’s plot – Captain Avenger, a fictitious third rate superhero whose movie is just opening in New York City. To help promote it a bunch of actors have been hired to don Captain Avenger costumes and hang outside the theaters to sign autographs. One of these actors is Steve Nichols (played by the late, great John Ritter), a decent enough guy struggling to make it in the big city

We know can link everyone in Hero at Large to Super, Fox's X-Men films, and the cast of A Few Good Men in just one degree..

We know can link everyone in Hero at Large to Super, Fox’s X-Men films, and the cast of A Few Good Men in just one degree..

One night after a screening, Steve ends up stopping an actual crime while still in his costume, and becomes a media sensation. Soon everyone is talking about the “real” Captain Avenger and, in a moment of either inspiration or insanity, Steve decides to continue operating as Captain Avenger, only to find out super-heroics in the real world isn’t as easy as in the comics or movies. Two things further complicate Steve’s career as a costume crime fighter: a new attractive neighbor named Jolene (played by Anne Archer) and a publicity agency hoping to use Captain Avenger’s fame to help boost the Mayor’s poll results and get him re-elected.  Will he win the girl? Will Steve sell out his ideals to these shady politicians? Will his nightlife of crime fighting get him killed? The answers to all of these are pretty predictable, as you’d expect from a movie that plays at times more like a TV sitcom pilot. .

As you can probably tell from the description, also don’t expect a dark and gritty Batman Begins style movie, or an outrageous satire like Super and Kick-Ass. It is much more a blend of Disney movie and New York romantic comedy (ala The Goodbye Girl or Tootsie, but with a much more bland formalism). This shouldn’t come as a surprise as the writer, AJ Carothers, worked for Uncle Walt, and the director, Martin Davidson, made his debut with the Brooklyn-set cult classic The Lords of Flatbush and would go on to direct some comedies before making Hero at Large.

Nor should you expect a mentally disturbed or delusional protagonist. Ritter’s Nichols is a genuinely good guy, one with goals and desires we can relate with, and while not yet successful as an actor he still has things going for him besides just his costume vigilantism (unlike characters in later RLSH movies who are pretty much all complete losers). He isn’t crazy and admits that the idea of dressing up as Captain Avenger is stupid and suicidal; he dons the costume not to fulfill some sort of juvenile comic book fantasy or need for revenge, but because he honestly feels he is inspiring the city and doing good.  And maybe he is.

A rally for what appears to be the friendliest fascist party ever.

A rally for what appears to be the friendliest fascist party ever.

This is where Hero at Large, despite its flaws, becomes interesting to me. Where the protagonist of Super, Kick Ass and even Defendor don costumes in an effort to boost their own self-esteem, Ritter’s Steve Nichols keeps putting on the Captain Avenger costume less for his own egotistical gratification and more as a form of civil responsibility. He looks at superheroes, especially Captain Avenger, as anonymous symbols of optimism and hope. Thus, he adopts the guise of Captain America in hopes of inspiring his fellow New Yorkers to follow his example and worry about their fellow citizens. All the other characters in the movie – his fellow actors, his agent,  Jolene, the publicity agent, the Mayor and his advisors, the female reporter trying to track him down, and even the denizens of the city – have all become jaded and indifferent from living in the big city, and it is only thru the selfle

ss actions of Captain Avenger that they change.   In this regards he is much less like the non-powered Batman, who is motivated by vengeance, and much more like the paragons of virtue Superman and Captain America. Which is ironic considering when the film was made.

Hero at Large was made and came out during what had been the most violent year in New York history up to that point[i], and this was after a two decade long rise in crime that had occurred in both NYC and the rest of the country.[ii] During the 70s, not only did NYC see its crime and murder rates skyrocket but also they had to endure a garbage strike, riots, blackouts, the Son of Sam killings, police corruption, urban flight[iii], and the city going bankrupt (not to mention all the problems going on in the rest of the country like the Cold War, Water Gate, the Recession, the energy crisis, etc.)  Cynicism and pessimism was everywhere, and it was especially prevalent in movies about the Big Apple, which showed it as a decadent, scary, crime-ridden and hopelessly corrupt. Movies such as Panic in Needle Park, Serpico, Dog Day After, Death Wish, Taxi Driver, Network, The Warriors,etc. Things were so bad by the time Hero at Large was released that the very next year, 1981, John Carpenter would release Escape from New York,a film were they just seal Manhattan off and turn it into a prison (and it isn’t by chance that a movie called A Most Violent Year is set in New York in that same year, 1981).

In short, NYC was a shithole.   

Yet Hero at Large consciously rebuffs those cynics and pessimist.  Yes, audiences already were growing tired of the dark and cynical films, flocking to Star Wars, Rocky and Superman so they could have someone to cheer. Hero at Large also supplied them with underdog-who-triumphs-over-adversary story, but at the same time acknowledging to a degree the truth of how much our cities had deteriorated without succumbing to defeatism. At times it plays like a rebuttal of Taxi Driver, an alternate version of the same story but with a much more heroic and sympathetic character standing in for Travis Bickle (I don’t think it’s coincidence that Steve Nichols works part time as a cab driver, that his first act of vigilantism is stopping the robbery of a small convenient store, that a political rally is the location of a major plot turn, and that the Mayor running for reelection is played by the same actor who played Senator Palatine); at other times it comes across as a herald of the Reagan era (but with less testosterone).[iv]

The anti-Travis Bickle in action for the first time.

The anti-Travis Bickle in action for the first time.

Compare this to RLSH movies like Defendor, Super or Boy Wonder, or even superhero movies like Punisher: War Zone or the upcoming television series Daredevil, which take place in an America that’s hasn’t been this safe in in over half a century[v] (especially NYC[vi]).  While crime and murder rates have never been lower, the heroes in these costumed vigilante shows share more in common with Travis Bickle than they do Captain Avenger. They are often cynical, frustrated, angry and very lonely (and I will go into even further detail about the influence of Travis Bickle and Taxi Driver on these movies in later reviews). The urban heroes of nowadays seem to want to act like it is still the violent and lawless 70s & 80s, as if maybe that is the only way to justify their existence. Superheroes have moved away from the idea of being a beacon of hope and inspiration and are now more of a revenge fantasy for frustrated, impotent adults.

While Hero at Large is not a great movie by any stretch of the imagination, the film is an interesting history piece. It is window an age when films transitioned from the pessimistic view of the 70s into the optimistic Reagan era of the 80s. It is also a reminder that once the idea of a man putting on a costume to fight crime wasn’t viewed as an act of rage or psychosis but instead an act of altruism.

Hero at Large Rating]

I give Hero at Large two-and-a-half Phoenix Joneses out of four.

Next installment (hopefully out sometime before 2016) I will cover the first modern Real Life Superhero movie, 2009’s Defendor, starring Woody Harrelson.

‘Nuff said.



[i] 1980 saw 180,235 violent crimes and 2,228 murders.

[ii] The number of murders in the US went from 9,110 in 1960, to 16,000 in 1970, to 20,510 in 1975, to 23,400 in 1980, the year Hero at Large was shot.

[iii] New York City’s population dropped 824,000 people in just a decade, from 1970 to 1980.

[iv] Unintentionally, this film could be looked at as a metaphor for Reagan – an actor taking up the guise of a character he plays, the “hero“, to make people feel good again and renew their faith in the country.




Tags: , , , , , ,

About Jarv

Workshy cynic, given to posting reams of nonsense on the internet and watching films that have inexplicably got a piss poor reputation.

36 responses to “superHUMAN! The Real LIfe Super-Hero Movies: Hero at Large (1980).”

  1. Jarv says :

    Humble apologies for the delay in posting this. My internets went tits up.

    Anyhoo, great review- one quibble I have is that I think there are 2 classifications of the wannabe superhero- the outright loser, usually done for satire, (Kick Ass, Kick Ass 2, Super) and the well-meaning retard who genuinely doesn’t understand the world around him (Defendor, Griff the Invisible- which incidentally you should add to the list). The difference is that the latter 2 films are nicer natured, and there’s a winsome quality to the protagonist- he’s idealistic, and doesn’t understand that what he’s doing is ludicrous and pathetic by any reasonable standards. They’re trying to change the world, and failing, not doing it for self-esteem issues (Super), or because it’s Cool (Kick Ass).

    This, for me, is why the latter two films are not only vastly better than the first three I mentioned, but also why they actually function as better satire of the genre than the first 3. Batman, for example, isn’t Batman because it’s cool- he’s Batman because he’s got serious personality issues. My view on this may be coloured by my loathing of Super, though.

    • Continentalop says :

      I agree there is a difference between DEFENDOR and KICK ASS or SUPER, and I am going to get into it more later their differences, but for now I am going to say the one common thread between all of them is that there is something wrong with the protagonist. Maybe they are not bad people, but they are still mentally handicapped or delusional/insane, and pathetic to a certain degree.

      I am still debating if I should do GRIFF THE INVISIBLE. It is more about a guy fantasizing about being a superhero than actually putting on the costume and doing it, isn’t it? If I do that I might have to do NUNZIO (1978) then.

      And I can’t believe I overlooked THE CANNONBALL RUN with Captain Chaos for this series.

      • Jarv says :

        Griff the Invisible is a nice one, because the guy is both a retard and slightly schizophrenic, so believes he does actually have super powers. The people in his life enable him up to a point- and he does things believing he’s invisible- when it’s obvious he’s not.

        Have you seen it?

    • Judge Droid says :

      the well-meaning retard who genuinely doesn’t understand the world around him (Captain America, Defendor, Griff the Invisible- which incidentally you should add to the list)


  2. Continentalop says :

    Thanks for posting and formatting it, and fixing the embarrassing typos. It still reads like a freshmen term paper IMO.

    • Toadkillerdog says :

      Very good job Conti,
      a very interesting and unique take on the genre or sub genre.
      I am curious though about why you chose Travis Bickle over Paul Kersey or even Billy Jack?

      The Magnificent Seven would be a great case for a super team. Of course then you introduce Kurosawa.

      • Jarv says :

        Kersey doesn’t work. Wrong genre- he’s from Westerns.

        Also, nobody explodes anyone with either a rocket launcher or a radio controlled soccer ball in these films.

        I did actually rewatch death wish for a series not so long ago

      • Toadkillerdog says :

        Not sure what you mean by he is from Westerns, unless it is Bronson in general? That still leaves Billy Jack

      • Jarv says :

        No, Kersey- the character. I’ll do the series and explain. There’s loads of tells in it

      • Toadkillerdog says :

        The other thing about Bickle is that he was intent on assassinating Senator Palantine. I see him as a prototype for the Punisher – now i have to look up who came first..ah Punisher made his debut in 1974 so maybe he was directly related to Kersey?

      • Jarv says :

        No. You have to remember what a hack Winner is. He genuinely saw Kersey as a linear descendent of the likes of the man with no name.

      • Toadkillerdog says :

        Ok, well lets get rolling then and get that series out!

      • Anonymous says :

        Thanks Toad.

        I choice Travis Bickle because there were the most similarities between TAXI DRIVER and some of these other films, and between Bickle and these other protagonist (or in the case of Steve Nichols in HERO AT LARGE, obvious reversals).

        I’m not saying they’re carbon copies of Bickle, but share enough DNA with him to make him a direct ancestor. I’ll get into more with each review but I’ll give one example: within this trend you see a trend of female prostitutes who need rescuing, the hero keeping a diary or journal, a sleazy pimp like character, and in at least one case a wrist mounted weapon. And that’s just for starts.

      • Continentalop says :

        Thanks Toad.

        I choice Travis Bickle because there were the most similarities between TAXI DRIVER and some of these other films, and between Bickle and these other protagonist (or in the case of Steve Nichols in HERO AT LARGE, obvious reversals).

        I’m not saying they’re carbon copies of Bickle, but share enough DNA with him to make him a direct ancestor. I’ll get into more with each review but I’ll give one example: within this trend you see a trend of female prostitutes who need rescuing, the hero keeping a diary or journal, a sleazy pimp like character, and in at least one case a wrist mounted weapon. And that’s just for starts.

      • Continentalop says :

        Also I think if you went to the origin of superhero teams, or at least how modern teams operate, you’d have to look at heist films. You’ve got your getaway drive, hired muscle, lookout, safe-cracker and brains in a heist, and with a super-team you’ve got your super fast guy, your walking tank, psychics, energy power guys, and the leader/strategist who may be an inventor or a detective, or both.

      • Continentalop says :

        I think the Punisher is a rip off of Mack Bolan, the Executioner.

      • Jarv says :

        I always had the exterminator in mind, myself

      • Continentalop says :

        I think the Exterminator is a rip off of Bolan and the Punisher.

      • Jarv says :

        I always get confused by the order they were released in.

  3. Just Pillow Talk says :

    I seem to recall giving this a 2 out of 4. I thought I was being lenient, but maybe not. I would agree how it was an interesting look back of the 70’s, plus the boots are way cool.

    • Jarv says :

      I seem to remember this being one of the better films in your painful run down.

    • Continentalop says :

      Hey pillow. To be honest I probably was lenient with HERO AT LARGE for 3 reasons

      1) Nostalgia.

      2) John Ritter.

      3) and mostly because I watched it after I saw the other films. It’s optimism and humanism were a much needed antidote to all the sadism, snark and hipster nihilism I saw in the last couple of films in the series (you can guess which ones those were).

      What sucks is now that I’m writing them up I have to go rewatch these, and some of them are painful to get through.

      • Just Pillow Talk says :

        As Jarv pointed out, my judgment was probably influenced, much like yours, by what was viewed prior to watching this. Having said that, it flat out is better than some of the shit you have to watch. Maybe not a good movie, but better.

      • Continentalop says :

        My big mistake was saving the KICK-ASS films until the end, right before this one.

  4. Judge Droid says :

    Good stuff, Conti. Haven’t seen this but I do love me some Ritter so I may have a look at some stage.

    Defendor and Boy Wonder are both great.

  5. Judge Droid says :

    Sidenote, A Most Violent Year is surprisingly restrained in its violence. It’s a decent film.

  6. tombando says :

    Holy shit–fucking footnotes?! Conti Pops–are you trying to become the Anti Harold? If so you succeeded. Nice job. Don’t think I saw this. Always a John Ritter fan.

  7. Xiphos0311 says :

    Good work here Conti.

  8. ThereWolf says :

    Excellent analysis of a film I have yet to see (in a ‘genre’ I hadn’t properly considered).

    ‘New York City’s population dropped 824,000 people in just a decade, from 1970 to 1980…’ Fascinating, that – even though the tables had me going cross-eyed.

    Still can’t get over footnotes on Moonwolves… Wait. Footnotes On Moonwolves – sounds like something Tomita (i) might write.

    Very professional, Conti.

    (i) Japanese electronic music pioneer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: