Made in Britain: Franklyn (2008)

When the National Lottery was set up, some of the takings were put aside to create a fund for charities, good causes, and culture. This has been, almost totally without exception (there are a few), an unmitigated disaster for the viewer. In the most part the films funded have been “right-on” art films (My Son the Fanatic), shameless commercial but not good enough to attract studio interest nonsense (Shooting Fish), dreadfully unfunny comedies starring a TV hot property (The Parole Officer) and the occasional gem (28 Days Later). The “hit” rate of worthwhile films funded by the Lottery is so bad, that it almost isn’t worth thinking about as it will make you ill. In the meantime, Channel 4’s film division, Film 4, also produced films, some of which (The Full Monty, Trainspotting to name two easy ones) went on to massive global success. So, in the mid 21st Century, the time was ripe for Gerald McMorrow to pluck these low hanging fruits with his sky-high concept film, Franklyn.

And they gave him £6m. £6m to a first time writer-director. This pisses me off so much when you consider that Neil Marshall and Edgar Wright don’t get that from British sources. Although after Scott Pilgrim, I’m not convinced Wright deserves it any more. We really do need to pull our fingers out and get Astrodykes v Werewolves on the Moon written, before people wise up to this kind of funding. 

Anyhow, McMorrow has to be given credit here. I cannot for the life of me work out how he managed to get funding for this film as, being generous, the script to Franklyn is a downright mess. The concept is fairly sound, and there is a good film in here struggling to get out, but it is smothered beneath extraneous storylines that do little more than confuse the issue. Someone should have seen this and as a direct consequence withheld funding. That he managed to hit the lottery up for so much cash shows a real snake-oil salesman at work, and I always sort of sneakily admire a well pulled off scam. If the joke wasn’t on us, that is.

Franklyn is a film of four parts that McMorrow attempts to bring together in the finale. The first part is the story of Preest,  Ryan Phillipe, a Private Eye operating in the dystopian Meanwhile City. Meanwhile City is run by religious dogma, and Preest is the only atheist who spends his time searching for “The Individual” who he blames for the death of a girl. In contemporary London, however, Peter Esser (Bernard Hill) is searching for his son, David (who is suffering from PTSD). Absolutely no prizes at all for guessing the identity of David, although credit to Phillipe for a reasonable English accent, and to be fair, the film doesn’t hide this. These two storylines should form the heart of the film, but sadly they don’t. Instead we’ve got Milo (Sam Riley) mooching around being all lovestruck and talking to his old friend Sally, played by Eva Green. Green also plays Emilia, who in a staggeringly pointless sideplot is an art student filming ridiculous and overwrought suicide attempts for a project. The film tries to draw all 4 strands together, and the climax is frustrating in how contrived it is and how unsatisfactory the resolution is.

This is a very, very good-looking film. It may have been relatively well-funded by British standards, but McMorrow did a fantastic job getting it all on the screen. The future sections in particular are supremely sumptuous and look absolutely amazing, particularly in contrast to the seedy low-rent London that the “real” part of the film takes place in. To complement the look of the film, the acting is also very good for the most part. Phillipe was good, Green is better as Sally than she is as Emilia, but passable in both, and Hill is excellent. However, there’s a big black hole of acting here and that’s Riley. He seems to mistake turning his collar up and pouting for putting in a performance. It doesn’t help, admittedly, that Milo is an utter drip in need of a good bitch slap, but still, this is a lousy performance from an otherwise talented actor.

As I’ve already said, the problem is that the film is amazingly muddled. The Milo section in particular should have been cut, as it adds nothing to events and serves as an annoying distraction. The Emilia part is also riven with problems, events are moving forward, and then the film comes to a crashing halt so she can go and talk to a mystic hospital porter (not joking, sadly). The Preest section on the other hand is hugely involving and rattles along at a rare old pace, as does the Esser narrative, and it’s immensely interesting to see the events from Preest’s perspective then the look of horror on Hill’s face as he deals with the reality of the situation, and the mess that his badly disturbed son has created. Were I to rewrite this film, then I’d drop the axe on the Milo section in its entirety and draw the Emilia story into the Preest narrative. We want to see the dystopia, this is the heart and soul of the film, and this bloody tiresome moping garbage with Milo is annoying to say the least.

Overall, I can’t say I recommend this. It isn’t crap, but it’s frankly (heh) a confused and irritating mess. There is a great film lurking below the surface, and it does indeed look fantastic, but, really, the focus is off and the storyline not properly centred. At the end of the day, there was the chance of something special here, but it’s been horribly botched and watching Franklyn leaves me with the feeling of “If only”. Franklyn is meh when it could have been special, and so I give it 1.5 Robot Marias out of 4. This is a crying shame.

Until next time,

Jarv

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

About Jarv

Workshy cynic, given to posting reams of nonsense on the internet and watching films that have inexplicably got a piss poor reputation.

23 responses to “Made in Britain: Franklyn (2008)”

  1. Jarv says :

    Utterly mediocre film this one.

    Still, I’m enjoying this series.

  2. Col. Tigh-Fighter says :

    The first I heard of this was when I saw it splashed all over billboards in the Tube. They sure did have some money to spend on it.

    I like the look of the Dark City distopian stuff. Shame it wasn’t a whole film of that.

  3. Jarv says :

    Rereading this review, it just occurs to me that this is just a longer version of what we’ve been talking about regarding this film in the Rec Room. As such, hope it isn’t dull.

  4. Xiphos0311 says :

    didn’t E4 also do Dead Set which was a surprisingly good zombie miniseries? Why was the one character suffering from “PTSD”?

    • Jarv says :

      Yes. E4 is one of Channel 4’s many outlets.

      Also do Misfits.

      Re PTSD- for the life of me I can’t remember. He served in Iraq or somewhere and I think he’s a bit brain damaged as well.

  5. Xiphos0311 says :

    I like movies with a dystopian angle but I think I will skip this one it sounds more angsty and emo then anything really dystopian.

    So England suffers from the same problem as Hollywood in that they have to go overseas to fill roles?

  6. The Thorn says :

    Jarv, you should advise people of upcoming spoilers in your commentaries – they may want to watch the films with the surprises intact…

    • Jarv says :

      Sorry, I’ve checked and edited.

      You’re right, and if I am usually about to spoil in a major way, I use invisitxt if it’s integral or don’t talk about it at all if it isn’t. Recent examples include Kill List which I skated over the whole last third, and back in the day Fierce People.

      I remember one of my first reviews was Sleepaway camp which has an enormous spoiler in it! I ended up putting 9 warnings before the bit in question.

  7. The Thorn says :

    That’s awesome! Even more so seeing as you’d probably advise people to NOT see this in the first place 😉

    Personally, I rather enjoyed it. In fact, I liked that it was so bloody hard to sort out that, afterwards, my friends and I felt compelled to discuss it at length. I’m a sucker for discussion fodder.

    Truth be told, two of us were immediately interested in watching it again, to see if with a different perspective. So it can’t be all bad.

    I agree about the ending, though… 🙂

    • Jarv says :

      Cheers.

      I have, Er, been known to spoil and dissuade because of the spoiler.

      This isn’t bad at all, just somewhat lacking. I’ve seen it twice now and I’m even more certain I’d ditch the Milo stuff.

      Compared to some of the crap I watch anyhow.

  8. Droid says :

    I felt cheated by this film. The trailer pretty much sold it as a distopian future set film. Alas that only made up 25% of the film. I really enjoyed the future section of the film but was very bored by the others.

  9. ThereWolf says :

    That’s a good review. A couple of us were on about ‘Franklyn’ at work only last week and this lad was saying, ‘oh, you should review it…’ and I told him no chance, I wouldn’t know where to start.

    I’d have to see the film again to comment properly. All the plot strands didn’t come together in the end. And you’re right, the Preest stuff is the most effective part of ‘Franklyn’. It did make me think of ‘Dark City’. I don’t recall Riley bothering me that much; it’s quite clever, the way McMorrow shoots Riley’s scene through the fence with Green – but a giveaway all the same. And I do like the reveal, when he talks to his mum (?) about her.

    I think it’s worth a look. It’s certainly provokes conversation, mainly along the lines of, “Did you see that ‘Franklyn film? What the fuck…?”

Leave a Reply to The Thorn Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: